Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate.77 After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and "major" complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the "drain group" versus 150 patients in the "no-drain" group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33-1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53-9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.

Conversion to Radical Nephrectomy From Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Is Most Commonly Due to Anatomic and Oncologic Complexity.

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is standard-of-care treatment for small renal masses. As utilization of partial nephrectomy increases and includes larger and complex tumors, the risk of conversion to radical nephrectomy likely increases. We evaluated incidence and reason for conversion to radical nephrectomy in patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy by surgeons participating in MUSIC (the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients in whom robotic partial nephrectomy was planned were stratified by completed procedure (robotic partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy). Preoperative and intraoperative records were reviewed for preoperative assessment of difficulty and reason for conversion. Patient, tumor, pathologic, and practice variables were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 650 patients scheduled for robotic partial nephrectomy, conversion to radical nephrectomy occurred in 27 (4.2%) patients. No conversions to open were reported. Preoperative documentation indicated a plan for possible conversion in 18 (67%) patients including partial with possible radical (n = 8), partial vs radical (n = 6), or likely radical nephrectomy (n = 4). Intraoperative documentation indicated that only 5 (19%) conversions were secondary to bleeding, with the remaining conversions due to tumor complexity and/or oncologic concerns. Patients undergoing conversion had larger (4.7 vs 2.8 cm, P < .001) and higher-complexity tumors (64% vs 6%, P < .001) with R.E.N.A.L. (for radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry score ≥ 10. The converted cases had a higher rate of ≥ pT3 (27% vs 8.4%, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of conversion from robotic partial to radical nephrectomy in the MUSIC-KIDNEY (Kidney mass: Identifying and Defining Necessary Evaluation and therapY) collaborative, and an even lower risk of conversion due to uncontrolled bleeding. Targeted review of each conversion identified appropriate decision-making based on oncologic risk in most cases.

Robotic salvage partial nephrectomy following surgical and ablative therapies.

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomies in the salvage setting after ablative or surgical therapy remain challenging cases that are underreported in the literature (1-5). The aim of this video is to demonstrate techniques for robotic salvage partial nephrectomy to manage recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after failed prior partial nephrectomy and primary cryotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 55-year-old man after previous robotic-assisted right partial nephrectomy presented with a 2.5 cm locally recurrent renal mass abutting the collecting system. A 59-year-old man with right renal cell carcinoma initially treated with cryoablation presented local recurrence. CT imaging demonstrated 2.6 cm right renal mass consistent with tumor recurrence at previous treatment site. RESULTS: Both procedures were completed in under 180 minutes. Clamp time was 22 minutes after the previous partial nephrectomy and 25 minutes after previous cryotherapy. There were no perioperative complications. Pathology in both cases demonstrated pT1a clear cell RCC with negative margins. Both patients have since no evidence of recurrent disease on follow-up imaging at 1 and 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage robotic partial nephrectomy should be considered as a feasible treatment option after failure of initial therapy-surgical or ablative. A salvage procedure is often more challenging than its standard therapy-naïve counterpart due to development of dense inflammation after previous interventions. Despite this, robotic partial nephrectomies in the salvage setting can be safely carried out with good surgical outcomes, particularly when utilizing intraoperative ultrasound to identify tumor margins and key anatomy.

Preoperative three-dimensional modelling and virtual reality planning aids nephron sparing surgery in a child with bilateral Wilms tumour.

Bilateral Wilms tumour (BWT) is a surgically challenging condition. Virtual reality (VR) reconstruction aids surgeons to foresee the anatomy ahead of Nephron Sparing Surgery (NSS). Three-dimensional (3D) visualisation improves the anatomical orientation of surgeons performing NSS. We herewith report a case of BWT where VR planning and 3D printing were used to aid NSS. Conventional imaging is often found to be inadequate while assessing the tumour-organ-vascular anatomy. Advances like VR and 3D printing help surgeons plan better for complex surgeries like bilateral NSS. Next-generation extended reality tools will likely aid robotic-assisted precision NSS and improve patient outcomes.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy: a safe and efficient improvement.

PURPOSE: Reducing operative injuries is important in living donor nephrectomy. The robot-assisted transperitoneal approach has some advantages than traditional laparoscopic techniques. However, longer operation time and risks of abdominal complications indicate the need for improved techniques. The aim of this study is to present the robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy and evaluate its safety and feasibility. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. From June 2016 to December 2020, 218 living donors underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Perioperative data such as operation time, warm ischemia time, length of stay and complications were collected and analyzed. To evaluate the feasibility of this surgical technique, the cumulative summation method was used to construct a learning curve. RESULTS: There were 60 male and 158 female donors aged 36-72 years, with an average age of 53.1 ± 6.8 years. Three patients (1.4%) were converted to open surgery. The mean operation time was 115.4 ± 41.9 min, the warm ischemia time was 206.6 ± 146.7 s, and the length of stay was 4.1 ± 1.4 days. Complications were reported in 22 patients (10.1%), three of whom (1.4%) had Clavien‒Dindo IIIa complications. No ileus occurred. No donors were readmitted. Four patients had delayed graft function. The cumulative summation curve showed that the number needed to reach proficiency was 33. The operation time and warm ischemia time after technical proficiency were 100.4 ± 21.6 min and 142.5 ± 50.7 s, respectively. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy is a safe and efficient technique that offers advantages of shorter operation time and no abdominal organ interference.

Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR 43-Robese study).

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence on the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). In this study, we aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of RPN and OPN. METHODS: We relied on data from patients who underwent PN from 2009 to 2017 at 16 departments of urology participating in the UroCCR network, which were collected prospectively. In an effort to adjust for potential confounders, a propensity-score matching was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between OPN and RPN patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 1277 obese patients (932 robotic and 345 open were included. After propensity score matching, 166 OPN and 166 RPN individuals were considered for the study purposes; no statistically significant difference among baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics was present. A higher overall complication rate and major complications rate were recorded in the OPN group (37 vs. 25%, p = 0.01 and 21 vs. 10%, p = 0.007; respectively). The length of stay was also significantly longer in the OPN group, before and after propensity-score matching (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in Warm ischemia time (p = 0.66), absolute change in eGFR (p = 0.45) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.12). At a median postoperative follow-up period of 24 (8-40) months, DFS and OS were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, RPN was associated with better perioperative outcomes (improvement of major complications rate and LOS) than OPN. The oncological outcomes were found to be similar between the two approaches.

Renal anatomical classification systems cannot predict the occurrence of vascular complications after partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between renal tumor complexity and vascular complications after partial nephrectomy using PADUA, RENAL, and ZS scores. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2018, a total of 1917 patients with available cross-sectional imaging were enrolled in the study. Logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of vascular complications. RESULTS: Of 1917 patients, 31 (1.6%) developed vascular complications, including 10 females and 21 males. The high-complexity category was significantly associated with a decreased risk of vascular complication in PADUA (OR = 0.256; 95%CI = 0.086-0.762; P = 0.014) and ZS score (OR = 0.279; 95%CI = 0.083-0.946; P = 0.040). Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were independent risk factors for vascular complications. Meanwhile, the incidence was significantly reduced in the recent 4 years in the high score tumor group alone in PADUA (0.2% [1/474] vs. 2.2% [3/139], P = 0.038) and ZS score (0.2% [1/469] vs. 2.7% [3/112], P = 0.024). In the first 8 years, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were the only two independent risk factors for vascular complications. In the recent 4 years, only the high-complexity category was significantly associated with a decreased risk of vascular complication in the PADUA score (OR = 0.110; 95%CI = 0.013-0.938; P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: The renal anatomic classification system cannot predict the occurrence of vascular complications after partial nephrectomy.

Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on prognosis after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) has been associated with worse prognosis in several malignancies. For renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the effect of PBT is still debated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of PBT on prognosis after nephrectomy in patients with RCC. METHODS: This study is A systematic review and meta-analysis of published article data (PRISMA protocol) for literature related to PBT and RCC through extensive search of EMBASE, Medline via PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, language limited to English, with no time constraint until May 20, 2022. We pooled the results of multivariable cox regression analyses from each study, with subgroup analyses by dose and timing of transfusion. All analyses were done using Stata14. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies involving 27,683 participants were included. Our meta-analysis pooled the results of multivariable cox regression analysis in each study, showing that PBT is associated with higher overall Mortality (OM; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34, 1.23-1.44), cancer-specific mortality (CSM; HR = 1.35, 1.20-1.51), and disease recurrence (HR = 1.54, 1.18-1.89). when only patients with nonmetastatic RCC were included, PBT was still associated with higher OM (HR = 1.29, 1.11-1.47) and disease recurrence (HR = 1.58, 1.18-1.98), but the association with CSM (HR = 1.26, 0.99-1.52) was not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis by transfusion dose, small (1-2) units of PBT were not associated with CSM (HR = 1.84, 0.95-2.73), but large (≥3) units were associated with higher CSM (HR = 2.98, 1.74-4.22) and disease recurrence (HR = 1.99, 1.31-2.67). Each additional unit of PBT resulted in a higher CSM (HR = 1.07, 1.04-1.10). In subgroup analysis by transfusion timing, intraoperative transfusion was associated with higher CSM and disease recurrence, but postoperative transfusion was not. CONCLUSIONS: PBT is associated with higher OM, CSM and disease recurrence. This adverse effect seems to be particularly significant in high-dose intraoperative transfusion. It is necessary to limit the overuse of PBT, especially high-dose intraoperative transfusion, in order to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing nephrectomy for RCC.

Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: recommendations of the Italian Society of Urology RCC working group.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (PN) aims to remove renal tumors while preserving renal function without affecting oncological and perioperative surgical outcomes. Aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence on PN and to provide evidence-based recommendations on indications, surgical technique, perioperative management and postoperative surveillance of PN for renal tumors in the Italian clinical and health care system context. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review is the result of an interactive peer-reviewing process of the recent literature on PN for renal tumors carried out by an expert panel composed of members of the Italian Society of Urology (SIU) Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: PN for localized renal tumors is not inferior to radical nephrectomy in terms of survival outcomes while significantly better preserving renal function. Loss of renal function after PN is influenced by medical comorbidities/preoperative renal function and surgical variables such volume of parenchyma preserved and ischemia time. Urologists should select the clamping strategy during PN based on their experience and patient-specific factors. PN can be performed with any surgical approach based on surgeon's expertise and skills. Robotic PN has the potential to expand the minimally invasive indications without interfering with oncological outcomes. The use of 3D virtual models, real time ultrasound and fluorescence tools to assess the anatomy and vascularization of renal tumors during PN may allow a more accurate preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. Proper postoperative surveillance protocols are essential to detect tumor recurrences and assess functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: PN is the standard of care for treatment of localized T1 renal tumors. Recent data supports PN also for selected T2-T3a tumors in experienced institutions. Careful preoperative planning, adequate surgical skills and volumes and appropriate postoperative management and surveillance are paramount to optimize PN oncological and functional outcomes.

Outcome benefits of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: An analysis of the TriNetX database.

BACKGROUND: The role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy remains debatable in the present era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with upfront CN and modern systemic therapies. METHODS: Using the TriNetX network database, we identified patients, in the period from 2008 to 2022, who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, receiving first-line systemic therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Their overall survivals were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method as well as multivariable regressions. RESULTS: We identified 11,094 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Of them, 2,914 (43%) patients in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort (n = 6,779), and 1,884 (43.7%) in the immune checkpoint inhibitors cohort (n = 4315) underwent upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy. Those receiving upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy showed survival advantages with either tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Hazard ratio 0.722, 95% Confidence interval 0.67-0.73, p<0.001) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (Hazard ratio 65.1, 95% Confidence interval 0.59-0.71, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy was a factor for improved OS in both cohorts: tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Hazard ratio 0.623, 95% Confidence interval 0.56-0.694, p<0.001) and immune checkpoint inhibitors cohort (Hazard ratio 0.688, 95% Confidence interval 0.607-0.779, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with an improved overall survival for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving either first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our results support a clinical role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in the modern era.

The long-term outcomes of local tumor destruction versus partial nephrectomy for cT1a non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and development of prognostic nomograms.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of authoritative opinions on local tumor destruction (LTD) for clinical T1a (cT1a) non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). We aim to compare the outcomes of cT1a nccRCC after partial nephrectomy (PN) or LTD and explore prognostic factors. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cT1a nccRCC receiving LTD or PN between 2000 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for patients receiving LTD and PN. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, competing risk regression models, and subgroup analysis were used to compare outcomes and identify prognostic factors. Prognostic nomograms were established and evaluated based on the multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 3664 cT1a nccRCC patients were included. The LTD group had poorer overall survival (OS) and similar cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with the PN group before and after PSM (p < 0.05), while the other-cause mortality rate of the LTD group was higher than that of the PN group. Age, marital status, household income, prior tumor history, interval between diagnosis and treatment, treatments, and tumor size were identified as independent predictive factors for OS. Age, tumor size, prior tumor history, and histological type were identified as independent predictive factors for CSS. Then the nomograms predicting OS and CSS were constructed based on these prognostic factors, which showed excellent performance in risk stratification and accuracy. CONCLUSION: LTD could achieve comparable cancer-control effects as PN among cT1a nccRCC patients. The OS and CSS nomograms worked effectively for prognosis assessment.

A contemporary comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To analyze surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy (OPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated our institutional RCC database for patients who underwent PN for RCC from 1997 to 2018. Decision for technique was at the discretion of the operating urologist, following practice patterns and training history. Outcomes analyzed included pre/peri/post-operative parameters, pathologic outcomes, and disease recurrence rates. RESULTS: 1088 patients underwent PN from 1997 to 2018. After exclusionary criteria, 631 patients who underwent 647 unique PNs for a total of 162 OPN and 485 LPN remained. Baseline, pre-op, and pathologic characteristics were not statistically different. Surgical time was lower in laparoscopic cases [185 vs. 205 min] (p = 0.013). Margin involvement was not statistically different; LPN had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) [150 vs. 250 mL] (p < 0.001) and longer ischemia time [21 vs. 19 min] (p = 0.005). LPN had shorter length of stay [2 vs. 4 days] (p < 0.001), fewer overall complications (p < 0.001), and no significant difference in high-grade complications [2.89 vs. 4.32%] (p = 0.379). Fewer LPN patients developed metastases [1.65 vs. 4.94%] (p = 0.0499). Local recurrence rates were not statistically different [1.24 vs. 3.09%] (p = 0.193). Renal function was equivalent between cohorts post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Long-term oncologic outcomes were not significantly different between LPN versus OPN, with no statistical difference in patient and tumor characteristics. LPN was associated with lower EBL, shorter length of stay, and lower overall complication risk. Renal function was not significantly different between cohorts.

Factors affecting the use of a three-dimensional model during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify cases that require a three-dimensional-printed kidney model in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We enrolled 93 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors at a single institution between November 2018 and May 2021. The endpoints were how often and how long the surgeon consulted the three-dimensional-printed model, determined using intraoperative video. Multivariate analyses of the endpoints were adjusted by preoperative patient and kidney characteristics, including renal vascular complexity that was defined as the number of vascular branches penetrating the surface tangential to the ventral side of the kidney. RESULTS: Of the 93 cases, the median frequency and duration of intraoperative three-dimensional-printed model consultation were four times and 39 s, respectively. The multivariate linear regression analyses showed that the frequency of intraoperative three-dimensional-printed model consultation by the surgeon was significantly related to the complexity of the arterial structure (≥4 branches), presence of hilar tumor, and high Mayo Adhesive Probability score; the regression coefficients were 1.81, 2.79, and 1.34, respectively. All p-values were ≤.03. The duration of the three-dimensional-printed model consultation was significantly related to the complexity of the arterial structure (≥4 branches) and the presence of hilar tumor; the regression coefficients were 21.6, and 29.0 s, respectively. All p-values were <.01. CONCLUSION: During robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, a three-dimensional-printed model would be helpful in cases with a complex arterial structure or hilar tumor.

Cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy versus partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) represents a treatment option for small renal masses with proven feasibility and tolerability. However, it has never been directly compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as an endpoint. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with RT or PN. We relied on 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, tumor size and histology. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied to a subset of patients with tumor size 21-40 mm. RESULTS: Of 40,355 patients with T1aN0M0 RCC, 40,262 underwent PN (99.8%) vs 93 underwent RT (0.2%). RT patients were older (median age 72 vs 60 years, p < 0.001) and harbored larger tumor size (median size 28 vs 25 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of non-clear cell RCC (49% vs 22%, p < 0.001). After 1:1 PSM (92 RT versus 92 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots' derived CSM was 21.3 vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, p < 0.001). In the subgroup with tumor size 21-40 mm, after 1:1 PSM (72 RT versus 72 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots derived CSM was 21.3% vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT also independently predicted higher CSM (HR 4.7, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In T1aN0M0 RCC patients, relative to PN, RT is associated with significantly higher absolute and relative CSM, even in patients with tumor size 21-40 mm.

Patient-specific, deliverable, and self-expandable surgical guide development and evaluation using 4D printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Accurate lesion diagnosis through computed tomography (CT) and advances in laparoscopic or robotic surgeries have increased partial nephrectomy survival rates. However, accurately marking the kidney resection area through the laparoscope is a prevalent challenge. Therefore, we fabricated and evaluated a 4D-printed kidney surgical guide (4DP-KSG) for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies based on CT images. The kidney phantom and 4DP-KSG were designed based on CT images from a renal cell carcinoma patient. 4DP-KSG were fabricated using shape-memory polymers. 4DP-KSG was compressed to a 10 mm thickness and restored to simulate laparoscopic port passage. The Bland-Altman evaluation assessed 4DP-KSG shape and marking accuracies before compression and after restoration with three operators. The kidney phantom's shape accuracy was 0.436 ± 0.333 mm, and the 4DP-KSG's shape accuracy was 0.818 ± 0.564 mm before compression and 0.389 ± 0.243 mm after restoration, with no significant differences. The 4DP-KSG marking accuracy was 0.952 ± 0.682 mm before compression and 0.793 ± 0.677 mm after restoration, with no statistical differences between operators (p = 0.899 and 0.992). In conclusion, our 4DP-KSG can be used for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, providing precise and quantitative kidney tumor marking between operators before compression and after restoration.

Renal cell carcinoma with an "uncoiling" tumor thrombus: intraoperative shift from level III to level IV.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus (TT) is complete surgical excision. The surgery is complex and challenging to the surgeon, especially with large tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium. Traditionally, these difficult cases required the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with or without deep hypothermic cardiac arrest, but in recent years, different surgical techniques derived from the field of liver transplantation have been used in efforts to avoid CPB. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of RCC with TT level IIIc (extending above major hepatic veins) that "uncoiled" intraoperatively into the right atrium after division of the IVC ligament, transforming into a level IV TT. Despite the new TT extension, the surgery was successfully completed exclusively through an abdominal approach without CPB and while using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) monitoring and a cardiothoracic team standby. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach and the utility of intraoperative continous TEE monitoring which helped to visualize the change of the TT venous extension, allowing the surgical teamto modify their surgical approach as needed avoiding a catastrophic event.

A 42-year-old patient with renal cell carcinoma presenting as low back pain: A case report.

RATIONALE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal neoplasm, accounting for 2.4% of all cancers in Korea. Although the usual clinical manifestations of RCC include flank pain, hematuria, and palpable mass, RCC is generally characterized by a lack of early warning signs and is mostly discovered incidentally in advanced stage. This case report describes a 42-year-old Korean man diagnosed with giant RCC who presented with simple back pain. PATIENT CONCERNS: The clinical manifestation of a 42-year-old Korean man was chronic back pain. DIAGNOSES: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 19.1-cm sized heterogeneous enhancing mass on the right kidney and tumor thrombosis extending into inferior vena cava. INTERVENTION: Due to the large size of the tumor and extensive tumor thrombosis, the multidisciplinary team decided to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy and an anticoagulant. Following 12 cycles of treatment with nivolumab and cabozantinib, he underwent a right radical nephrectomy with an adrenalectomy and tumor thrombectomy. OUTCOMES: Treatment was successful and posttreatment he started a cancer rehabilitation program. He was followed-up as an outpatient and no longer complains of back pain. LESSONS: RCC can manifest clinically as back pain, with diagnosis being difficult without appropriate imaging modalities. RCC should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with low back pain, even at a young age.

[Two Cases of Retroperitoneal Synovial Sarcoma].

We experienced two cases of renal primary synovial sarcoma. Case 1: A 29-year-old man underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and was originally diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. Case 2: A 25-year-old man was treated by open radical nephrectomy since radiographical findings indicated tumor invasion to the ureter causing hydronephrosis. Both cases were pathologically diagnosed as renal synovial sarcomas, and were followed using computed tomography. Recurrence was observed within a year in both cases.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) can be performed either by a transperitoneal (TP) or a retroperitoneal (RP) approach. However, the superiority of one approach over the other is not established. Hence, the primary aim of this review was to compare perioperative outcomes between these two surgical approaches. METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes following TP RAPN and RP RAPN. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023399496). The primary outcome was comparing complication rates between the two approaches. RESULTS: This review included 22 studies, 5675 patients, 2524 in the RP group, and 3151 in the TP group. The overall complications were significantly lower in the RP group [Odds ratio (OR) 0.80 (0.67, 0.95), p = 0.01]. However, the rate of major complications was similar between the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter with the RP group [Mean Difference (MD)-16.7 (- 22.3, - 11.0), p = < 0.0001]. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and need for blood transfusion (BT) were significantly lower in the RP group. There was no difference between the two groups for conversion to radical nephrectomy [OR 0.66 (0.33, 1.33), p = 0.25] or open surgery [OR 0.68 (0.24, 1.92, p = 0.47] and positive surgical margins [OR 0.93 (0.66, 1.31, p = 0.69]. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the RP group [MD - 0.27 (- 0.45, - 0.08), p = < 0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: RP approach, compared to TP, has significantly lower complication rates, EBL, need for BT and LOS. However, due to the lack of randomized studies on the topic, further data is required.

Prognostic significance of pT3a staging subclassifications in renal cell carcinoma: Not all pT3a are equal.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic significance of perinephric fat, renal sinus fat, and renal vein invasion in patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by histologic type. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC was performed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data for the years 2010 through 2019. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between pT3a subclassification groups and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by histological subtype (clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, and other). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 10,170 patients with pT3a RCC, including 8,446 (83.0%) with clear cell RCC and 1,724 (17.0%) with nonclear cell RCC (nccRCC). Median follow up was 36 months. Differences in CSS by pT3a subclassification groups were observed in all histological subtypes but were most pronounced in nccRCC, specifically papillary RCC. Compared to perinephric fat (PF) invasion only, renal vein (RV) invasion (HR = 4.9, 95%CI: 2.5-9.3, P < 0.01), renal sinus fat invasion (HR = 3.0, 95%CI: 1.4-6.2), RV and PF invasion (HR = 7.5, 95%CI: 3.5-16.0), and combination of all three characteristics (HR = 4.4, 95%CI: 1.2-15.5) were associated with worse CSS in patients with papillary RCC. CONCLUSION: We examined the prognostic role of pT3a staging subclassifications in RCC by histologic subtype and observed survival differences, particularly in papillary RCC. Our findings highlight the need to refine pT3a staging criteria to help guide individualized, multimodal treatment strategies for locally advanced RCC.